I am really looking forward to giving a presentation to the incoming Freshman Class at Case Western Reserve University on November 20th.
The topic is “Why Personality Matters: Free Traits and the First Year Experience.” CWRU has an outstanding First Year
Experience program and I am keen to meet the students and faculty, to talk about recent research, and to have some fun. @DrBrianRLittle
Update, February 27th, 2010.
Just back from NYC where I presented a lecture at the One Day University event on February 25th at the CUNY Graduate Center. The topic was “The Happiness of Pursuit: New Insight on Human Nature.” The audience was wonderful and I greatly enjoyed chatting with many of you. As requested, here is some follow up information that I hope will be helpful.
Susan Cain’s book, Quiet, is an exceptional book about the quiet strengths of introversion and the pervasiveness of the extravert ideal. Her Chapter 9, as I mentioned to some of you, provides more information about me than you could ever want to know! Quiet has met with extraordinary success and has zoomed up the NYTimes and Amazon best seller charts.
Many of you asked about the reference to Owen Flanagan’s piece from which I quoted at the end of my lecture. It is the final chapter of his book Self Expressions. Although the book is a serious work of analytic philosophy, that final chapter does indeed read like poetry. Please email me if you wish to get a copy. firstname.lastname@example.org
Thanks to all at OneDayUniversity and the remarkable attendees who make it such a pleasure for those of us who profess.
“Take Brian Little. He’s a research psychologist and superstar academic lecturer, his class on personality at Harvard was perennially one of the most popular at the university. He’s also a serious introvert…”
TIME subscribers can read the full article online.
Dr. Brian Little shares what he learned about golf — and the people who provide the golf experience — after his keynote address at a general session.
Watch More Than Just a Game – A Visit with Dr. Brian Little | GCSAA TV
By Brian R. Little | From the April-May 2010 Issue of Academic Matters
Sometimes, the academic life demands that faculty deny their fundamental personality traits. But if collegial respect includes allowing colleagues the latitude to nurture their true characters, academics can survive and thrive amidst the challenges of academic life.
It often comes down to personality. Despite the candidate’s obvious brilliance, tenure is denied. The comment “insufferably arrogant,” uttered almost sotto voce just before the vote, helps tip the scales. Across campus a dedicated but painfully shy associate professor is reading the term’s teaching evaluations and, once again, is simply devastated. And over at the faculty club, a newly minted Professor Emeritus bounces into the retirement party to find only three attendees at the event, trying in vain to create the illusion of a throng. Later, at the bar, the reluctant pseudo-celebrants agree on one thing — this wouldn’t have happened to any of their other colleagues. Personality matters. Continue reading
In K. M. Sheldon,T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (2011).
Designing Positive Psychology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 228-247.
Positive psychology and personality science emerged virtually simultaneously as the new millennium appeared on our horizon. The aspirations and research agendas of these two intellectual movements overlap yet their core tasks differ.[i] The central concern of positive psychology is to reorient psychology to positive features of human conduct that have been understudied in conventional psychology such as hope, happiness, exceptional accomplishment, virtuous action and human flourishing (Sheldon, Frederickson, Rathunde, Csikszentmihalyi & Haidt, 2000.) In exploring these topics positive psychology is concerned with aspects of human thought, feeling and action that are, in Peterson’s (2006) terms, “north of neutral.” Personality science, the hub of which is an invigorated and expanded personality psychology, aims to explore and integrate the full range of diverse influences on personality drawing on disciplines ranging from molecular genetics to narrative theory (Cervone & Mischel, 2002a; Little, 2005, 2006). Its explorations extend both north and south of neutral. I suggest that the geographic center of personality science is essentially equatorial.
My goal for this chapter is to reflect on how these two movements have co-evolved and how they may continue to do so. The key substantive question I explore is this: to what extent and in what ways are positive emotions, orientations, and actions critical for human well-being? Drawing on research in personality science I will make the case that for some individuals, under certain circumstances, adopting what I will call a northern tilt will be highly adaptive. Under other circumstances, however, an upward bound approach to life might be less adaptive. At its worst, unmitigated positivity might catch us unawares and bring us to our knees. Continue reading